Legal Opinion

St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. Heard & Heard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 1933No. 9172PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY, Justice.

Appellee, Heard & Heard, a private corporation, instituted this suit against the St Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Company, asking damages in the sum of §7,500, for the destruction of appellee’s truck, which was struck by a train operated by the servants of appellant

The cause was submitted to a jury by the trial judge, on seven special issues, contained in his main charge. A number of specially requested issues were also given and submitted to the jury. The jury answered each of the first six issues “Yes” and the seventh “$6,-500,” and accordingly judgment was rendered in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Federal Surety Co. v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Gattegno v. ParisianTexas Commission of Appeals · 1982
  3. Psimenos v. HuntleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Gilmer v. GrahamTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  5. Fidelity & Guaranty Fire Corp. v. OrmandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harrison-Wright Co. v. BuddCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. GurianCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Fox v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Winters Mut. Aid Ass'n v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Baker v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API