Hygeia Distilled Water Co. v. Hygeia Ice Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Suit to restrain the defendant from infringing the plaintiff’s trade-mark, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County and tried to the court, JRorabaek, J.; facts found and judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and appeal by the defendant for alleged errors in the rulings of the court.
Read the full summary
Suit to restrain the defendant from infringing the plaintiff’s trade-mark, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County and tried to the court, JRorabaek, J.; facts found and judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and appeal by the defendant for alleged errors in the rulings of the court. The complaint consists of three counts, in each of which it is alleged, in substance, that the plaintiff is the owner of a trade-mark or name consisting of the word “Hygeia,” and has the sole and exclusive right to use the same in connection with the business of making and selling distilled water…
1Opinion of the CourtToeeance, J.
The assignments relating to the exceptions to the finding may be laid out of the case. They are all founded upon the action of the court in finding or in refusing to find certain facts from conflicting testimony, and therefore cannot be considered by this court so as to be available to the defendant upon this appeal. Atwater v. Morning News Co., 67 Conn. 504; Thresher v. Dyer, 69 id. 404.
Before considering the questions based upon the overruling of the defendant’s claims, it may be convenient to dispose of those relating to the rulings upon evidence, the first of which is the admission of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Manufacturing Co. v. TrainerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- State v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Atwater v. Morning News Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Boardman v. Meriden Britannia Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1868
- Keasbey v. Brooklyn Chemical WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. OuelletteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Roden v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Richmond v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Coffin v. LaskauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Macmahan Pharmacal Co. v. Denver Chemical Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.