Legal Opinion

Wilhelm v. Schmidt

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1876PublishedCited by 21 opinions

. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. W- W. Fabwell, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Sheldon

Krewer and his wife, by warranty deed dated June 13,1874, conveyed to Schmidt and Glade a part of lot 139, in Butter-field’s addition to Chicago, subject to an incumbrance by way of trust deed, made by Krewer and wife September 7, 1870, to one Troost, as trustee, to secure the payment of Krewer’s promissory note, of even date therewith, for $800, to Hi cholas Wilhelm, payable two years after its date, with ten per cent per annum interest, payable annually.

Troost having, on the 22d day of September, 1874, advertised to sell the premises under the trust deed, for the satisfaction of the amount…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Field v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Tobey v. BarberNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  3. Hare v. StegallIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Alden v. GoldieIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cain v. VogtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Caldwell v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  3. Riner v. Southwestern Surety Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Compound Lumber Co. v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Noble v. SturmMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API