Napoli v. Canada Dry Bottling Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for the wrongful termination of the plaintiffs’ soft drink distribution route, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), entered May 9, 1988, which denied their motion for leave to serve a second amended complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
While leave to serve a supplemental or amended pleading shall be freely granted (see, CPLR 3025 [b]), such a motion is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court (see, Edenwald Contr. Co v City of New York, 60 NY2d 957; Hypertronics Inc. v…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Beuschel v. MalmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Alexander v. SeligmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Gallo v. AielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Hypertronics Inc. v. Digital Equipment Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Konrad v. 136 East 64th Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Felix v. LettreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- State v. Fermenta ASC Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1994
- Thompson v. ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Ravnikar v. Skyline Credit-Ride, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.