Legal Opinion
Morlock v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 29, 2002No. C2-01-340PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O P PN I O N
GILBERT, Justice.
This case involves whether or not the district court erred in giving an aggravation of a preexisting condition instruction based on CIVJIG 91.40 and, if so, whether a new trial is warranted. Appellants Dean E. Morlock and Judy A. Morlock brought suit against respondent St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company after Dean Morlock was injured in an automobile accident, seeking to recover underinsured motorist benefits for Dean Morlock’s injuries and for Judy Morlock’s loss of consortium. At the end of trial, and over respondent’s objections, the district court instructed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Alholm v. WiltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Lindstrom v. Yellow Taxi Company of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Blatz v. Allina Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- George v. Estate of BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Bolander v. BolanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Rowe v. MunyeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Daly v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.