Legal Opinion

Van Doorn v. United Statesq

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 3, 1924No. 2302PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Appellant appeals from the judgment of the Board of General Appraisers, which affirmed the assessment of duty at 15 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 329 of the tariff act of 1913, on an importation of books entitled “Holland America.” The protest claims the merchandise to be free of duty under the provisions of paragraph 425 of the same act. The competing paragraphs in part are as follows:

329. Books of all kinds, bound or unbound, * * * not specially provided for in this section, 15 per centum ad valorem.

425. (Free list.) * * * Publications of individuals for gratuitous…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. Smith & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Silk Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  2. B. Westermann Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  3. Geigy Chemical Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. United States v. American Railway Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API