Legal Opinion

Ware v. Ammon

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 18, 1925PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clay

Affirming.

In the year 1922 the General Assembly passed an act defining and regulating the business of dry cleaning and dyeing in cities of the first and second class. Acts 1922, chapter 125, page 364; Kentucky Statutes, sections 2741g-l to 2741g-37 inclusive. The title of the Act is:

“An act defining and regulating the business of dry cleaning and dyeing in cities of the first and second class, and providing for the construction, maintenance, and inspection by the state fire marshal of dry cleaning and dyeing buildings and establishments, and providing ways and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Tolliver v. BlizzardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. Lawton v. Stewart Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Kentucky Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  2. City of Seattle v. ProctorWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Kennton, Etc. v. Goodpaster, Etc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  4. Kenton & Campbell Benev. Burial Ass'n v. GoodpasterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1946
  5. Shelton v. McCarrollCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API