Legal Opinion

Guilford v. Boston Scientific Corporation

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided April 3, 2020No. 4:19-cv-00955Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION DONNA GUILFORD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:19-CV-00955-DGK ) BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS This products-liability action arises out of Plaintiff Donna Guilford’s injuries after being implanted with two of Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation’s surgical-mesh products, Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair Kit (the “Pinnacle”) and Obtryx Mid-Urethral Sling (the “Obtryx Sling” and collectively with the Pinnacle, the “Products”). Now before…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Keener v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Renaissance Leasing, LLC v. Vermeer Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  4. Nesselrode v. Executive Beechcraft, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  5. Monson v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API