Legal Opinion

People v. Moffitt

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided November 17, 2015PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Melissa A. Crane, J.

A defendant has a qualified, not an absolute, right to counsel when deciding whether to submit to a breath test to determine blood alcohol content (see People v Smith, 18 NY3d 544, 549 [2012]; People v Gursey, 22 NY2d 224, 227 [1968]). However, once afforded, if that qualified right is to have any meaning, the communication between the defendant and his or her attorney must be private. Because the police prevented that privacy here, the court suppresses the results of the breath test, all statements defendant made while on the phone with his attorney,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. People v. BerriosNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. People v. MalinskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. Jereme Roesing v. Director of Revenue, State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
  3. Amended September 21, 2016 State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  4. State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API