Legal Opinion
Carson v. Walker
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Decided September 22, 2003No. 07-01-0402-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DON H. REAVIS, Justice.
Arthur Carson, an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, presents eight issues by which he contends the trial court erred in dismissing his action for negligence, violations of the Civil Rights Act and Americans with Disabilities Act, and other claims against David Walker, Pete Lopez, Jr., and George Utters, Correction Officers at the William P. Clement’s Unit, Texas Tech Medical Branch (Clements Unit), TDCJ-ID Inmate Trust Fund, and the Clements Unit Law Library, appellees. By his issues, he asserts (1) the evidence was insufficient to support a finding…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mansfield State Bank v. CohnTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Isiah Carl Green v. Dan v. McKaskle Acting Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Hickson v. Moya, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1996
- Arthur X. Carson v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Harrison v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
- Arthur Carson v. Douglas Dretke, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
- Arthur Carson v. Douglas Dretke, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
- Arthur Carson v. Douglas Dretke, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
- Donald Ray McCray v. Charlotte Booker, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.