Legal Opinion
King v. Hanson
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided December 27, 1989No. 1—88—3284PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE FREEMAN
delivered the opinion of the court:
This appeal originated as a result of a judgment on a claim filed by Edith Mae Hanson (claimant) against the estate of Fritz G. Hanson (decedent).
The facts of this case are not in dispute. Claimant was married to the decedent in June 1925. The couple divorced in Minnesota in 1945. The Minnesota divorce decree provided that the decedent was to pay claimant the monthly sum of $125 for alimony and support of the minor children born out of their union. In 1946, decedent left Minnesota and relocated to Illinois. In 1952, claimant also…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Light v. LightIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- Holton v. HoltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Larsen v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- In re Marriage of FrascoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Sarron v. SarronAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- In Re Marriage of FrascoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994