Legal Opinion

Quillen v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 13, 1930No. [No. 23, January Term, 1930.]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBowl, C. J.

A decree in this case held that land, the title to which was in the name of the defendant, Ada Bell Quillen, was impressed with a resulting trust in favor of heirs of her father, now dead, and she has appealed from that decree. John T. Keas was joined as defendant because of a power of attorney given him by Mrs. Quillen in 1928, and recorded; it gave him power of disposition over the properties concerned, and. the decree annulled the power. The question to he decided is entirely one of fact, on testimony taken and documents exhibited. The principles of law have been sufficiently discussed by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Springer v. SpringerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  2. Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  3. Dorsey v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1819
  4. Moran v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Berkey v. DeliaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. Taylor v. First National Bank of TuskaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  3. Long v. HusemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  4. Maas v. LucasCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Cropper v. LambertsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API