Legal Opinion
State v. Martin
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1999No. 65454-9PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.
Defendant Keith Martin contends that his case should have been dismissed due to the State’s failure to comply with his right to a speedy disposition, pursuant to RCW 13.40.130 and JuCR 7.12(a) or in the alternative that the court lost jurisdiction to sentence him because the hearing was scheduled more than 21 days after Defendant’s guilty plea. We conclude that Martin was not prejudiced by the delay and affirm his conviction and sentence.
Facts
Keith Martin was charged in Chelan County on November 22, 1995, with two counts of first degree possession of stolen property. The charges stemmed from…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. Montalvo-MurilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. BergeronWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. DavisonWashington Supreme Court · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- State v. A.M.R.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. MarkingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. MarkingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.