Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Borough of Hamburg

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County

Decided June 24, 1982No. 271, no. 13PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAYLOR, J.,

After trial without a jury we found plaintiff’s right to recovery was limited by section 8553(d) of the Political Subdivision *455Tort Claim Act.1 Plaintiff now seeks a new trial claiming we were in error.

The facts are not in dispute.2 At issue is the interpretation of section 8553(d) which limits damages under the act. Subsection (d) reads:(d) Insurance Benefits — If a claimant receives or is entitled to receive benefits under a policy of insurance other than a fife insurance policy as a result of losses for which damages are recoverable under subsection (c), the amount of such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Carroll v. County of YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Topelski v. Universal South Side Autos, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Commonwealth v. DuncanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Dominski v. GarrettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Michel v. City of BethlehemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Germantown Savings Bank v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API