Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Borough of Hamburg
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County
1Opinion of the Court
SAYLOR, J.,
After trial without a jury we found plaintiff’s right to recovery was limited by section 8553(d) of the Political Subdivision *455Tort Claim Act.1 Plaintiff now seeks a new trial claiming we were in error.
The facts are not in dispute.2 At issue is the interpretation of section 8553(d) which limits damages under the act. Subsection (d) reads:(d) Insurance Benefits — If a claimant receives or is entitled to receive benefits under a policy of insurance other than a fife insurance policy as a result of losses for which damages are recoverable under subsection (c), the amount of such…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Carroll v. County of YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Topelski v. Universal South Side Autos, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Commonwealth v. DuncanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Dominski v. GarrettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Michel v. City of BethlehemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Germantown Savings Bank v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986