Germantown Savings Bank v. City of Philadelphia
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge MacPhail,
The sole issue presented for our disposition in these consolidated appeals is whether Section 8553(d) of the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act (Act), 42 Pa. C. S. §8553(d) is unconstitutional as violative of equal protection. For the reasons which follow, we hold that Section 8553(d) of the Act is constitutional.
The facts are not in dispute. I.C.S. Corporation and Germantown Savings Bank (Appellants) brought separate subrogation actions against the City of Philadelphia (City) alleging that the City’s negligence in inspecting and maintaining certain fire hydrants…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Singer v. SheppardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Daly v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Zauflik, A., Aplt. v. Pennsbury School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- American Legion Post No. 57 v. LeaheySupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Zauflik v. Pennsbury School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Williams v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Fernandez v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.