Legal Opinion
Sanford v. Street
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 10, 1936No. 26426PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The material facts in this case on the determinative issue are that a petition and amended petition to quiet title were filed under the direction of plaintiff signed only by an attorney who had been suspended for nonpayment of dues at the time the petitions were filed. Answers, some of which included cross-petitions, were filed, and later these answering defendants moved to dismiss the plaintiff’s original petition and amended petition, alleging that they are a nullity and have no legal force or effect because not signed by plaintiff in person or by an attorney authorized to practice law in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shade v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Home Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Manspeaker v. Bank of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moses v. HoebelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- National Diversified Business Services, Inc. v. Corporate Financial Opportunities, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Gilliland v. Chronic Pain Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Centorp Corp. v. Gulf Production Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Cooper v. BondoniCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.