Legal Opinion

Riddell v. Bell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 2008No. WD 68920PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSEPH P. DANDURAND, Judge.

Steve and Diane Bell appeal from the trial court’s judgment awarding damages against the Bells and allowing remedial action on Joe Riddell’s property. The Bells raise four points on appeal. They contend that the trial court erred in measuring damages based on the cost of repair; in awarding damages they claim were barred for Mr. Riddell’s failure to mitigate his damages; in refusing their request to present additional evidence; and in refusing to grant their request for remittitur. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Facts

The Bells and Joe Riddell own…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Call v. HeardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. Brandt v. PelicanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Hensic v. Afshari Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. State v. PolleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Damon Pursell Construction Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jacobson Warehouse Co., Inc. v. Schnuck Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  2. Gateway Foam Insulators, Inc. v. Jokerst Paving & Contracting, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. Hogan v. BD. OF POLICE COM'RS OF KAN. CITYMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Julie Shiplet v. Larry L. Copeland and Judith A. Copeland, D/B/A C&C Car Sales Bob Lees, D/B/A Auto Body PlusMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Hames v. BellistriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API