Tuttle v. Tuttle
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Traill county; Polloch, Judge. Action by Martha Christina Tuttle against Ole B. Tuttle. Judg-' ment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. There must be corroboration. Kuhl v. Kuhl, 124 Cal. 57, 56 Pac. 629; Berry v. Berry, 145 Cal. 784, 79 Pac. 531; Ashbum v. Ashbum, 101 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from District Court, Traill county; Polloch, Judge. Action by Martha Christina Tuttle against Ole B. Tuttle. Judg-' ment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. There must be corroboration. Kuhl v. Kuhl, 124 Cal. 57, 56 Pac. 629; Berry v. Berry, 145 Cal. 784, 79 Pac. 531; Ashbum v. Ashbum, 101 Mo. App. 365, 74 S. W. 394; Daeters v. Daeters, — N. J. Eq. —, .38 Atl. 950; Moak v. Moak, — N. J. Eq. —, 48 Atl. 394; Garcin v. Garein, 62 N. J. Eq. 189, 50 Atl. 71. Corroboration must be of the material allegations. Ortman v. Ortman, 92 Mich. 172, 52 N. W. 619; Potter v. Potter, 75 Iowa, 211, 39…
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
This is an appeal from a decree of the district court of Traill county granting the respondent an absolute divorce from the appellant on the ground of extreme cruelty, and giving the custody and control of four small children, issue of the parties, to the respondent, and awarding to her permanent alimony. The parties were married in September, 1898, at Hillsboro, North Dakota, and resided for a number of years upon the appellant’s farm near Mayville, but later they moved into the city of Mayville, and at the time of the trial resided there. The .appellant was the owner of 960 acres of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Clopton v. CloptonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by13 opinions
- Piatt v. PiattIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
- Schillerstrom v. SchillerstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- Heinmuller v. HeinmullerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
- Spradling v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Fleck v. FleckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.