Legal Opinion

Heinmuller v. Heinmuller

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 15, 1919PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Two appeals in one record from Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City. (Ambler, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

On the 6th day of October, 1917, Helen P. Heinmuller, the appellefe, filed a bill of complaint against her husband, Carl Heinmuller, in which she prayed:

“(a) That your oratrix may be awarded the care, custody and guardianship of the two infant children, Carl and Louise M. Heinmuller;
“(b) That your oratrix may be declared to be entitled to receive by way of permanent alimony' such an allowance of her husband’s estate as may be proportionate to his earnings and station in life;
“(c) That in the meantime the said Carl Heinmuller, her husband, may be required to pay unto your oratrix a reasonable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Polley v. PolleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  2. Outlaw v. OutlawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  3. Lynch v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
  4. Gill v. GillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  5. Bennett v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Silverberg v. SilverbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  2. Fleegle v. FleegleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
  3. Moran v. MoranCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  4. Schriver v. SchriverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  5. Wendel v. WendelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API