Eddy v. Dennis
Supreme Court of the United States
Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. This is a suit by Paul Dennis against Daniel Eddy, Walden ' Eddy, and Abram Reynolds, doing business as Eddy & Co., for an infringement oí reissued letters-patent No. 1515, granted' to the complainant Aug. 4,1863, being a reissue of original letters No. 19,412, which bear date Feb. 23, 1858. The specification and drawings of the reissue are- as follows: — <£ To all whom it may concern:…
Read the full summary
Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. This is a suit by Paul Dennis against Daniel Eddy, Walden ' Eddy, and Abram Reynolds, doing business as Eddy & Co., for an infringement oí reissued letters-patent No. 1515, granted' to the complainant Aug. 4,1863, being a reissue of original letters No. 19,412, which bear date Feb. 23, 1858. The specification and drawings of the reissue are- as follows: — <£ To all whom it may concern: “ Be it known that I, Paul Dennis, of Bemis Heights, in the county of Saratoga, and State Of New York, have -invented a…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt
delivered-the opinion of the court.
Dennis, the Complainant below, obtained an injunction and recovered damages against Eddy and others for an infringement of'his. letters-patent for an improvement in “shovel plows.” The original letters were issued on the twenty-third day of February, 1858,- and the patent was reissued on the fourth day of August, 1868.
The claim made under the. reissued patent is in the words following: —
“ Having thus described my invention, I wish it distinctly under-, stood that I dó not claim broadly the idea of passing a portion of the earth over the mould-board into the…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Knapp v. MorssSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Reece Button-Hole Ma. Co. v. Globe Button-Hole Ma. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1894
- Torrey v. HancockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Enterprise Railway Equipment Co. v. Pullman Standard Car Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- Frederick Iron & Steel Co. v. Sanford Riley Stoker Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.