Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Bindseil

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided February 3, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from fourth district court.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

This action was brought to recover a balance alleged to be due for the services performed under a contract to instruct the defendant in the art of draughting patterns by scales. Trial was had, and resulted in judgment for defendant, from which plaintiff has appealed to this court. The parties differ in some respects as to the terms of the contract, but a preponderance of proof clearly establishes the contract asserted by defendant, which was as follows : On January 8, 1889, plaintiff agreed to teach defendant the art of draughting patterns by scales, in lessons of two and one-half hours each,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Zaleski v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  3. Gibson v. CranageMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Burr v. . StentonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Vanderkarr v. VanderkarrNew York Supreme Court · 1814

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mackenzie v. MinisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Crawford v. . Mail Express Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Haehnel v. TrostlerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907
  4. Dermody v. FlesherAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898
  5. Haven v. RussellNew York Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API