Legal Opinion

Britt v. Allen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 15, 1971No. 7119SC551PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Although not designated as such, the judgment appealed from amounted to a summary judgment. Rule 56 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56, relating to summary judgments, provides in pertinent part as follows: * * * “A party against whom a claim, counterclaim, or cross claim is asserted or a declaratory judgment is sought, may, at any time, move with or without supporting affidavits for a summary judgment in his favor as to all or any part thereof. * * * The motion shall be served at least 10 days before the time fixed for the hearing.”

In the instant case defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ketner v. RouzerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Lane v. FaustCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Batch v. Town of Chapel HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Bailey & Associates, Inc. v. Wilmington Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. Britt v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Buckner v. TigerSwan, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API