Legal Opinion

Enstar Petroleum Co. v. Mancias

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided May 31, 1989No. 04-89-00166-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an original proceeding for writ of mandamus directing the Honorable Fernando G. Mancias, Judge of the 93rd District Court, to disqualify attorney David Hocke-ma and the law firm of Flores, Munoz, Hockema and Reed from representing the plaintiffs in the suit below. The plaintiffs, and real parties in interest, are James G. Murry and Roy P. Murry, d/b/a Three M Properties, James G. Murry, Jr., Individually and d/b/a Three M Properties.

The record before us reveals that in hearings conducted by the trial court, the following evidence was produced.

The real parties in interest,…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. NCNB Texas National Bank v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. American Can Company v. Citrus Feed Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Petroleum Wholesale, Inc. v. Marshall, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. HECI Exploration Co. v. Clajon Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Vaughan v. WaltherTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. JK AND SUSIE L. WADLEY RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND BLOOD BANK v. Morris, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  4. Rio Hondo Implement Co. v. Euresti, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
  5. Scarborough v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API