Enstar Petroleum Co. v. Mancias
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is an original proceeding for writ of mandamus directing the Honorable Fernando G. Mancias, Judge of the 93rd District Court, to disqualify attorney David Hocke-ma and the law firm of Flores, Munoz, Hockema and Reed from representing the plaintiffs in the suit below. The plaintiffs, and real parties in interest, are James G. Murry and Roy P. Murry, d/b/a Three M Properties, James G. Murry, Jr., Individually and d/b/a Three M Properties.
The record before us reveals that in hearings conducted by the trial court, the following evidence was produced.
The real parties in interest,…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- NCNB Texas National Bank v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- American Can Company v. Citrus Feed Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Petroleum Wholesale, Inc. v. Marshall, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
4Cited by19 opinions
- HECI Exploration Co. v. Clajon Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Vaughan v. WaltherTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- JK AND SUSIE L. WADLEY RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND BLOOD BANK v. Morris, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Rio Hondo Implement Co. v. Euresti, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
- Scarborough v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.