State ex rel. Dix v. McAllister
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Dix asserts that the court of appeals erred by dismissing his complaint. The court of appeals, however, properly dismissed Dix’s complaint for the following reasons.
First, as the court of appeals held, the misnumbering of the aggravated murder statute in Dix’s indictment did not invalidate the indictment, as we held in State v. Morales (1987), 32 Ohio St.3d 252, 254, 513 N.E.2d 267, 270, fn. 4. See Crim.R. 7(B), which provides:
“Each count of the indictment or information shall state the numerical designation of the statute that the defendant is alleged to have violated. Error in the numerical…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. MoralesOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Wenzel v. EnrightOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State ex rel. Johnson v. Ohio Parole BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Walker v. Lancaster City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Borsick v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State ex rel. Hawk v. Athens CountyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- State ex rel. Jackson v. CallahanOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Pesci v. LucciOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State ex rel. Elko v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Simpson v. CooperOhio Supreme Court · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.