State ex rel. Pesci v. Lucci
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment denying a writ of prohibition to vacate a criminal conviction and sentence. Because the true objective of the prohibition claim is to secure the convict’s release from prison, we affirm the denial of the writ.
{¶ 2} In 2001, appellant, James E. Pesci, was convicted of three counts of burglary and sentenced to prison. On appeal, the court of appeals affirmed the judgment of conviction and sentence. State v. Pesci, Lake App. No. 2001-L-026, 2002-Ohio-7131, 2002 WL 31866167. We did not accept Pesci’s discretionary appeal for review. State v. Pesci, 98 Ohio…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Foster v. Belmont County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- State ex rel. Nelson v. GriffinOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. Clements v. OlsenOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State ex rel. Dix v. McAllisterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Hamilton v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2005
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Jackim v. AmbroseOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Mosley v. Eberlin, 08 Be 7 (12-12-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State ex rel. Elder v. CollinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Jakim v. Ambrose, Unpublished Decision (1-9-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State ex rel. Cunningham v. ReedOhio Supreme Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.