Legal Opinion

Levine v. Nowell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 11, 1967No. 42461PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

Conceding, but without deciding, that the evidence demanded a finding that the defendant was negligent and that this negligence was the proximate cause of the automobile collision, the evidence authorized but.did not demand a finding that plaintiff had suffered any injury attributable to the collision. The jury is the judge of the veracity of parties and witnesses; under the evidence in this record they were authorized to disbelieve plaintiff’s claim of injury as a result of the collision. Accordingly the judgment for defendant, based upon the verdict of the jury, will *80not be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miller v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jarrett v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Hiter v. ShelpCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Jarrett v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API