Legal Opinion
James R. Farthing v. City of Shawnee, Kansas
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 8, 1994No. 93-3346PublishedCited by 141 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant James R. Farthing appeals an order of the district court granting defendant-appellee the City of Shawnee’s motion for summary judgment. The district court concluded Mr. Farthing did not possess a protected property interest in continued employment with the City and therefore the City’s denial of his request for a post-termination hearing did not deprive him of his right to procedural due process. Mr. Farthing subsequently filed a timely notice of appeal, 1 which properly invoked our jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
The…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- Garcia v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Hatfield v. Board Of County Commissioners For Converse CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Lancaster v. Independent School District No. 5Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Yoder v. Honeywell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Couture Ex Rel. M.C. v. Board of Education of the Albuquerque Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.