Legal Opinion

Kincaid v. Gomez

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 17, 1969No. Civ. 25152PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDevine, P. J.

The question in this case is whether defendants, respondents, who are sued on a promissory note, are entitled to the protection of section 580b of the Code of Civil Procedure, the antideficiency judgment statute which applies to purchase money security conveyances.

A written agreement for the sale by plaintiff Kincaid of a parcel of land in Sacramento County was made with “Ralph Gomez and/or.Nominee hereinafter referred to as purchaser. ’ ’ The purchase price was $75,000, of which $20,000 was paid in cash, and the purchasers assumed a first deed of trust for about $30,000, which was later…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Valinda Builders, Inc. v. BissnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Heckes v. SappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Roberts v. GravesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Jonathan Manor, Inc. v. Artisan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Engelman v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spangler v. MemelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API