Legal Opinion
Williams v. King
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided March 15, 2006No. CV 98-S-1938-NEPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED MEMORANDUM OPINION
SMITH, District Judge.
This opinion marks the third occasion on which this court has been required to address substantive due process challenges to an Alabama statute that criminalizes the commercial distribution of “any device designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs.” 2 See Williams v. Pryor, 41 F.Supp.2d 1257 (N.D.Ala.1999) (“Williams I”), rev’d, 240 F.3d 944 (11th Cir.2001) (“Williams II”); see also Williams v. Pryor, 220 F.Supp.2d 1257 (N.D.Ala.2002) (“Williams III”), rev’d, 378 F.3d 1232 (11th Cir.2004) (“Williams…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sherri Williams v. Troy KingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- 1568 Montgomery Highway, Inc. v. City of HooverSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Christopher v. ChristopherCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- 1568 Montgomery Highway, Inc. v. City of HooverSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010