Legal Opinion

Paul v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 11, 2013No. SC11-690PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuince, J.

We have for review Paul v. State, 59 So.3d 193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011), wherein the Fourth District certified conflict with the First District’s decision in Crapps v. State, 968 So.2d 627 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. The certified conflict involves an issue of statutory construction: whether shooting into an occupied vehicle under section 790.19, Florida Statutes (2001), qualifies for prison releas-ee reoffender (PRR) sentencing under the forcible felony catch-all provision of the PRR statute, section 775.082(9)(a)l.o, Florida Statutes (2001). We…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. HearnsSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  2. Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Valdes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  4. Kasischke v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  5. State v. BurrisSupreme Court of Florida · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Mario EstrellaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Eder Mendez-HenriquezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  3. Gary G. Debaun v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
  4. State v. DanielsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  5. Gordon v. FishmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API