United States v. Eder Mendez-Henriquez
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:
The one issue on appeal is whether a prior offense constitutes a crime of violence (COV) for imposing an enhancement under the Sentencing Guidelines. In challenging his sentence for illegal reentry after removal, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, Eder Vladimir Mendez-Henriquez asserts his sentence was erroneously enhanced under Guideline § 2L1.2, based on the district court’s concluding he committed a COV; he maintains his 2008 conviction, of California Penal Code § 246 — for maliciously and willfully discharging a firearm at an occupied motor vehicle —…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Voisine v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Fredis Reyes-ContrerasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Eric VerwiebeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. PamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Latroy BurrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.