Legal Opinion

United States v. Eder Mendez-Henriquez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 30, 2017No. 15-41551PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:

The one issue on appeal is whether a prior offense constitutes a crime of violence (COV) for imposing an enhancement under the Sentencing Guidelines. In challenging his sentence for illegal reentry after removal, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, Eder Vladimir Mendez-Henriquez asserts his sentence was erroneously enhanced under Guideline § 2L1.2, based on the district court’s concluding he committed a COV; he maintains his 2008 conviction, of California Penal Code § 246 — for maliciously and willfully discharging a firearm at an occupied motor vehicle —…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Voisine v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Fredis Reyes-ContrerasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Eric VerwiebeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. PamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. Latroy BurrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API