Atlantic City R. v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, District Judge.
The sole ques"tion presented by this appeal is the propriety ■of the learned District Judge’s refusal to give binding and/or peremptory (see Empire State Cattle Co. v. A., T. & S. F. R. R. Co., 210 U. S. 1, 28 S. Ct. 607, 52 L. Ed. 931, 15 Ann. Cas. 70) instructions in favor of the defendant railroad company. This request for the direction of a verdict was urged upon the familiar ground of contributory negligence upon the part of the plaintiffs, the driver of a truck and his companion.
The accident, whose happening and ensuing litigation presents this problem, originally…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Railroad Company v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Schofield v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Delaware & Hudson Co. v. NahasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926