Legal Opinion

Atlantic City R. v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 21, 1926No. Nos. 3353, 3354PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, District Judge.

The sole ques"tion presented by this appeal is the propriety ■of the learned District Judge’s refusal to give binding and/or peremptory (see Empire State Cattle Co. v. A., T. & S. F. R. R. Co., 210 U. S. 1, 28 S. Ct. 607, 52 L. Ed. 931, 15 Ann. Cas. 70) instructions in favor of the defendant railroad company. This request for the direction of a verdict was urged upon the familiar ground of contributory negligence upon the part of the plaintiffs, the driver of a truck and his companion.

The accident, whose happening and ensuing litigation presents this problem, originally…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Railroad Company v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Schofield v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Delaware & Hudson Co. v. NahasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API