Legal Opinion
Handy & Harman v. Borough of Park Ridge
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 27, 1997PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
MICHELS, P.J.A.D.
Claimant Borough of Park Ridge (Park Ridge) appeals from an Arbitration Decision of an Administrative Law Judge that denied its claim for reimbursement from the New Jersey Spill Compensation Fund (Spill Fund) established by N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11i pursuant to the provisions of the New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act (Spill Act), N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11 to -23.24.
Briefly, Park Ridge owns and operates a drinking water supply system, drawing from nineteen underground wells, which supplies Park Ridge and Woodcliff Lake residents. In…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Henry v. Rahway State PrisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- State, Dept. of Environ. Protect. v. Ventron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Campbell v. Department of Civil ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Twiss v. State, Dept. of TreasurySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lacey Municipal Utilities Authority v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Lacey Municipal Utilities Authority v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Nl Industries, Inc. v. State(076550)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- Sarasota-Coolidge Equities II, LLC v. S. Rotondi and Sons, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Handy & Harman v. Borough of Park RidgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.