Legal Opinion
McLaughlin v. National Benefit Life Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 19, 1988No. 65341PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice:
In February of 1983 appellants William and Nellie McLaughlin were contacted by Roger Hilst concerning life insurance plans. Roger Hilst was a producing sub-agent of appellee National Benefit Life. The general agent under whom Hilst worked was Norman Weinberg. Norman Weinberg in turn did business as Capital Dynamics.
The contact between Hilst and the McLaughlins resulted in a decision whereby the McLaughlins were to cash in their existing life insurance and use the cash obtained to purchase a life insurance plan offered by appellee National Benefit Life. This plan was to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Christian v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Tyler v. SheaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Slocum v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- United Engines, Inc. v. McConnell Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Badillo v. Mid Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Sims v. Great American Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- E.G. Thompson and Betty Thompson v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Newport v. USAASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- David Lee Willis v. Midland Risk Insurance Company, and Rogers County Insurance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.