State v. Carter

I am unable to agree with the majority opinion; however, I have reached the same result, but on an entirely different ground.

I am of the opinion that the information filed in this case charges a crime, under Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 7612-21 [P.C. § 3552-31], subsection (1). The information contains eight counts, which are identical except as to the value of the money alleged to have been collected or received, and the names of the employees. The charging part of count one is as follows:

"He, the said Carroll Carter, being the elected, acting, and qualified county treasurer of King county,…