Everette v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
These cases involve workers who were injured during the course of their employment during the construction of the trans-Alaska pipeline. The workers have sued Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. to recover for their injuries. 1 Alyeska was the agent for the oil companies which own the permit authorizing construction of the pipeline. Alyeska, however, did not engage in any construction activity. Instead, it contracted with numerous “execution contractors” to do the actual work. These execution contractors were the direct employers of the injured workers. The contracts between…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sloan v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Clabaugh v. BottcherAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Morris v. City of SoldotnaAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Hobbs v. Mobil Oil CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
- Searfus v. Northern Gas CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Redinger v. Living, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Moloso v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Plummer v. Bechtel Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Parker Drilling Co. v. O'NEILLAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Brock v. Alaska International Industries, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.