William Arvidson v. Dillingham Corporation, a Corporation Doing Business Under the Assumed Business Name of Albina Engine & MacHine Works
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, District Judge:
This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee in four separate actions (consolidated for trial) commenced by plaintiffs-appellants, who were painters employed by appellee, for personal injuries suffered in an explosion and fire on a barge which was being constructed by appellee for its own use. 1 Appellee voluntarily commenced the payment of benefits under the Oregon Workmen’s Compensation Law, Oregon Revised Statutes 656.-001 et seq., and the payments were accepted by appellants. 2
In their complaints appellants alleged both negligence and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Reed v. the YakaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Byron Gizoni v. Southwest Marine, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Buna v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1977
- Baker v. Pacific Far East Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1978
- Barber v. New England Fish CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Karen Murphy v. Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.