Legal Opinion

William Arvidson v. Dillingham Corporation, a Corporation Doing Business Under the Assumed Business Name of Albina Engine & MacHine Works

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 26, 1972No. 25951PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMESON, District Judge:

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee in four separate actions (consolidated for trial) commenced by plaintiffs-appellants, who were painters employed by appellee, for personal injuries suffered in an explosion and fire on a barge which was being constructed by appellee for its own use. 1 Appellee voluntarily commenced the payment of benefits under the Oregon Workmen’s Compensation Law, Oregon Revised Statutes 656.-001 et seq., and the payments were accepted by appellants. 2

In their complaints appellants alleged both negligence and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Reed v. the YakaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Byron Gizoni v. Southwest Marine, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Buna v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1977
  3. Baker v. Pacific Far East Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1978
  4. Barber v. New England Fish CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Karen Murphy v. Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API