Legal Opinion

Hindman v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 20, 2017No. 16-257Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-257 Filed: March 20, 2017 ****************************************

5 U.S.C. § 5305

(Special Rates Of * Pay); *

5 U.S.C. § 5596

(Back Pay Act); NICHOLAS HINDMAN, * 5 U.S.C § 5754 (Federal Workforce * Flexibility Act of 2004, Plaintiff, * Retention Bonuses); *

28 U.S.C. § 1491

(Tucker Act v. * Jurisdiction); * 5 C.F.R §§ 530.301–309 (Special THE UNITED STATES, * Rates of Pay) *

5 C.F.R. §§ 575.301–314 Defendant. * (Retention Incentives); * Rules of the United States Court of * Federal Claims (“RCFC”) * 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6). *…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API