Legal Opinion
Schroeder v. Wells
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided October 9, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
Action for personal injuries. Upon a trial nisi, the defendant had a verdict from the jury. Motion was filed by plaintiff asking for a new trial, and this motion was sustained and a new trial granted. Prom such order the defendant takes this appeal. The pleadings are thus tersely outlined by appellant:
“The amended petition counts upon the following assignments of negligence: (1) negligent failure to keep a vigilant watch and stop the car in the shortest time and space possible, in violation of the ordinance; (2) negligent operation of the car at a high, excessive, dangerous and unreasonable…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Smith v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Gray v. Columbia Terminals Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Huckleberry v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Marczuk v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- Grubbs v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.