Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. Wells

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 9, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

Action for personal injuries. Upon a trial nisi, the defendant had a verdict from the jury. Motion was filed by plaintiff asking for a new trial, and this motion was sustained and a new trial granted. Prom such order the defendant takes this appeal. The pleadings are thus tersely outlined by appellant:

“The amended petition counts upon the following assignments of negligence: (1) negligent failure to keep a vigilant watch and stop the car in the shortest time and space possible, in violation of the ordinance; (2) negligent operation of the car at a high, excessive, dangerous and unreasonable…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Smith v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Gray v. Columbia Terminals Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  3. Huckleberry v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  4. Marczuk v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  5. Grubbs v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API