Legal Opinion

Cull v. Pfeifer

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 9, 1957No. 45659PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COIL, Commissioner.

Plaintiff, Mrs. Edna Cull, instituted this equity suit to cancel certain deeds and for other relief. She is the daughter of defendant, Elizabeth C. Pfeifer. Defendant, George PI. Pfeifer, is plaintiff’s brother and the son of defendant Elizabeth. Harry R. Pfeifer, Jr., is plaintiff’s nephew and the grandson of defendant Elizabeth, and defendant, Loretta P. Pfeifer, is Harry’s wife.

Plaintiff averred that her mother was 89, feeble, infirm, nearly blind, unable to read, and incapable of managing her affairs; that she was in the custody of and under the domination and control…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hribernik v. Reorganized School District R-3Missouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Peine v. SaterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Houghton v. WestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  4. McGinnis v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Garrison v. SchmickeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bourne Ex Rel. Bourne v. ManleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Allen v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Spaeth v. LarkinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Lange v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Listerman v. Day and Night Plumbing & Heating Serv.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API