Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. City Of Cleveland

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 27, 1998No. 96-3967PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

137 F.3d 905

76 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 505,

72 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,235, 40 Fed.R.Serv.3d 66

Janelle RUTHERFORD, Daniel David, John Rajic, Richard

Dembie, James Hoban, James Imars, Steven Sakal, Andrew

Christopher, Kevin Riley, Judith Torres, Norbert Kelssey,

Deborah McClure, Deborah Evans, and Theodore Horak, On

behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly

situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

CITY OF CLEVELAND, Defendant-Appellee,

The Shield Club, Intervenor/Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-3967.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 24, 1997.

Decided March 4, 1998.

Rehearing and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frank v. United Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Garrish v. United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement WorkersDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  3. Fox v. Saginaw, County ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  4. Raymo v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  5. Riley v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API