City of Indianapolis v. Tansel
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom B'oone Circuit Court; B. 8. Higgins, Judge. Action by Jasper O. Tansel against tbe city of Indianapolis for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
Appellee recovered judgment for $7,000 on account of personal injuries. Appellant assigns that the court erred in overruling (1) its motion for judgment on the jury’s answers to interrogatories and (2) its motion for a new trial.
The motion for judgment is predicated on this interrogatory and answer: “Did the defendant city, at the time plaintiff received his alleged injury, have actual notice of the broken condition of the culvert where it is alleged plaintiff fell? Answer: No evidence.” The general verdict found all the material averments of the complaint to be true. If the complaint counted…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Adams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Peerless Stone Co. v. WrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- City of Fort Wayne v. PattersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Murray v. WeberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Rains v. BallowIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nickey v. SteuderIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Guth v. BellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Kuykendall v. County CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968
- Johnson v. RuleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- Central Union Telephone Co. v. SokolaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.