Legal Opinion

City of Fort Wayne v. Patterson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 11, 1891No. 256PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Prom the Allen Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, J. —

In the appellee’s complaint against the appellant a cause of action was stated for a personal injury occasioned by a defect in an alley crossing on one side of a certain street of the city. Among other averments, it was stated in the complaint that for a long time prior to the date of the injury the appellant had negligently permitted a washout, or hole, to remain unfilled and uncovered, at the alley cross.ing, which fact was unknown to the appellee; that on, etc., he was properly and lawfully driving along said street with a wagon loaded with wood, for delivery in said alley, and,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City of Fort Wayne v. CoombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Board of Commissioners v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Wabash Railway Co. v. SavageIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. City of Logansport v. JusticeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. City of Warsaw v. DunlapIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Muncie v. HeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Rhodius v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Schulte v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Johnson v. GebhauerIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n v. SpringsteenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API