Legal Opinion
Manoog v. Miele
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 7, 1966PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReardon, J.
This case involves a deficiency judgment and is here on the defendants’ exceptions to the judge’s refusal to give certain instructions to the jury and to his ex- elusion of a question during trial. The facts are as follow.
On December 4, 1958, the defendants executed a $45,000 note secured by a mortgage on certain parcels of real estate. They defaulted on this note in May, 1962. Following notice on October 5, 1962, of his intention to foreclose, the plaintiff took possession of the premises on October 23, 1962. On October 26, 1962, nineteen days before the foreclosure sale, the plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cambridge Savings Bank v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- West Roxbury Co-operative Bank v. BowserMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Union Market National Bank v. DerderianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Dexter v. ShepardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Lexington Trust Co. v. McCabeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Seppala & Aho Construction Co. v. PetersenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Oyegbola v. DeSimoneMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996
- Edry v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National Bank (In Re Edry)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
- Katz v. WinokurMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Guarino v. FarleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.