Legal Opinion

Katz v. Winokur

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 6, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action by a mortgagee, the plaintiff, to recover a deficiency from his mortgagor, the defendant, following a foreclosure sale held on February 5, 1975, of premises in Fitchburg. The defendant claims that the plaintiff failed to act in good faith and with reasonable diligence in executing the power of sale in the mortgage because he proceeded with the foreclosure in the midst of a severe snowstorm. This issue was tried to a jury in the Superior Court which returned a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount of the deficiency. Judgment was thereafter entered on the jury’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. DesLauries v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Clark v. SimmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Cambridge Savings Bank v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Seppala & Aho Construction Co. v. PetersenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Chartrand v. Newton Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fayette County National Bank v. LillyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Tarvezian v. Debral RealtyMassachusetts Superior Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API