Legal Opinion

United States v. Mitchell

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 21, 1955No. 7021PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused was charged with assaulting a superior noncommissioned officer who was in the execution of his office (Specification 1) and with willful disobedience of the officer’s order (Specification 2), in violation of Article 91, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 685. He pleaded guilty to the former and not guilty to the latter, but was convicted of both charges. Intermediate appellate authorities affirmed the conviction. We granted the accused’s petition for review to consider the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. VoorheesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. McKown v. . HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  3. United States v. DeCarloUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. MayoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. GrayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  3. United States v. ShepherdUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  4. United States v. McLaughlinU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
  5. United States v. WarrenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API