Rother v. La Renovista Estates, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID L. RUSSELL, District Judge.
The Defendants, La Renovista Estates, Inc., Earl E. Meyer, David H. Ratliff, and Larry L. Hodges, filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in response to the Plaintiffs Complaint, and a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in response to the Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint. The Court will consider these as one Motion for Sum mary Judgment. The Plaintiff has filed a Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Court will first address that portion of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment directed to the Plaintiff’s action under federal and state securities law…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Clarence E. Bennett v. Kenneth Berg, Dan R. Sandford, Jr. v. Kenneth BergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Marine Bank v. WeaverSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Richey v. Westinghouse Credit Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1986
- Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. Children's Shelter, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1985