Legal Opinion
In Re Feiock
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 31, 1989No. G003512Published
1Opinion of the Court
215 Cal.App.3d 141 (1989)
263 Cal. Rptr. 437
In re PHILLIP WILLIAM FEIOCK on Habeas Corpus.
Docket No. G003512.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.
October 31, 1989.
COUNSEL
Richard Schwartzberg, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Ronald Y. Butler, Public Defender, Frank Scanlon, Assistant Public Defender, Richard Aronson, Richard Schwartzberg and Mark Licker, Deputy Public Defenders, for Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Cecil Hicks, District Attorney, Michael R. Capizzi, Assistant District Attorney, Maurice L. Evans, Bruce M. Patterson, David L. Himelson,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.