Legal Opinion
Starline Optical Corp. v. Caldwell
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 17, 1984No. Civ. A. 84-2657PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STERN, District Judge.
Gentlemen:
This action is before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1338, patent jurisdiction; plaintiffs requested a declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 2201. Defendant has moved for dismissal of the complaint alleging lack of jurisdiction over his person, F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2). In reaching its decision, this Court has reviewed all submissions by the parties pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 78 and, for the reasons discussed below, finds it lacks in personam jurisdiction over defendant and therefore orders the matter transferred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.
FACTS
Co-plaintiff…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Database America, Inc. v. Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- KVH Industries, Inc. v. MooreDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1992
- Database America, Inc. v. Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Jaffe v. JulienDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Med-Tec, Inc. v. KostichDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.