Legal Opinion

State v. SECOND JUDICIAL DIST. CT.(PULLIN)

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2008No. 50328PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this original petition for a writ of mandamus, we decide whether ameliorative amendments to the deadly weapon enhancement statute (NRS 193.165) apply to offenders who committed their crimes prior to the effective date of the amendments but were sentenced after that date. We conclude that they do not. We further reaffirm the general rule that crimes are punishable in accord with the law in force at the time a defendant commits his crime unless the Legislature clearly expresses its intent to the contrary. We conclude that legislative intent, this court’s jurisprudence, and sound…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Holiday v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Tellis v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Redeker v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. SylvaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by25 opinions

  1. Lamb v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Stromberg v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. BarrenNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Picetti v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. CookeUtah Supreme Court · 2025

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API